Clinical Trial Matching
Connect patients with relevant clinical trials using structured medical evidence.
TrialCompass
TrialCompass compares a patient’s condition, history, biomarkers, location, and available evidence with active study criteria, then explains why each trial may be relevant, uncertain, or potentially excluding.
Intended user or buyer
For teams responsible for research access.
TrialCompass compares a patient’s condition, history, biomarkers, location, and available evidence with active study criteria, then explains why each trial may be relevant, uncertain, or potentially excluding.
Patients and familiesResearch coordinatorsAcademic medical centersOncology practices
Workflow problem
The work becomes harder when evidence and action live apart.
Trial information is distributed across large registries and written in complex inclusion and exclusion language. Manual matching is slow, depends on many clinical details, and can overlook studies that deserve a closer conversation.
Product focusConnect patients with relevant clinical trials using structured medical evidence.
The experience organizes the next review around the information people need to understand and verify.
Product interface preview
A focused workspace for the decision at hand.
Representative content shows how the product brings evidence, status, and the next review step into one interface.
Trial match reviewTrialCompass
Coordinator confirmationActive workspace
Understand why a study may fit—and what is still unknown.
Each result separates supported criteria, possible conflicts, and missing information instead of hiding them inside one score.TrialsActive
CriteriaExplained
EligibilityUnconfirmed
Customer outcomes
What changes for the people doing the work.
Connect patients with relevant clinical trials using structured medical evidence.
Search beyond keywords
Connect diagnosis, stage, biomarkers, prior treatment, age, location, and recruitment status in one matching view.
Explain the match
Show which criteria appear satisfied, which remain uncertain, and which may exclude the patient.
Identify the next question
Surface missing laboratory, pathology, genomic, treatment, or location information needed for a more complete review.
Core workflow
A guided path from information to reviewed action.
Each stage keeps the current work state understandable and carries the supporting context forward.
Profile
Organize the patient’s clinical evidence.
Retrieve
Find active studies that may be relevant.
Structure
Translate eligibility into clear criteria.
Compare
Show matches, conflicts, and unknowns.
Confirm
Research team determines eligibility.
Capabilities
Useful at every step, clear at every handoff.
Capabilities are described through the workflow people can use and review—not through the technology operating behind the screen.
Patient profile review
Organize notes, pathology, imaging summaries, labs, medications, biomarkers, treatment history, and structured records.
Active trial discovery
Search by disease, stage, intervention, biomarker, location, recruitment status, and age group.
Structured eligibility
Convert complex inclusion and exclusion text into criteria that can be compared with the patient profile.
Explainable ranking
Rank possible matches using clinical fit, eligibility coverage, geography, recruitment status, and evidence completeness.
New-trial alerts
Notify users when a newly listed study appears relevant to a saved profile.
Example product output
A more understandable starting point for the trial conversation.
TrialCompass explains the evidence behind a possible match and makes uncertainty visible before a patient or clinician invests time in the next step.
Trial match reviewA more understandable starting point for the trial conversation.
Example outputPotential conflicts are shown, not hidden in a score.
Missing information becomes a clear follow-up question.
Final eligibility remains with the research site.
Prepared for qualified review
Clinical Trial Matching · NeoTechSource