Administrative clinical intelligence · Citation-first workflow
Build the authorization packet around evidence, not memory.
Make every requirement traceable before the packet leaves.
Reconcile clinical records with active, versioned payer criteria. Review exact quotes, requirement-level matches, visible documentation gaps, and every claim in a versioned packet before it moves forward.
Intended user or buyer
For authorization teams preparing evidence-rich requests for qualified review.
Designed for revenue-cycle and clinical-administrative teams that must connect an active policy requirement to the exact supporting record before a packet is submitted.
Workflow problem
A complete-looking packet can still hide a missing requirement or unsupported claim.
Reviewers must locate the correct policy, reconcile it with the record, expose documentation gaps, and verify every material statement across a workflow that is often spread across documents and queues.
Prior authorization work is not simply letter generation. The system must prove which record and which active policy passage support each requirement while keeping missing documentation visible before submission.
Product interface preview
A realistic view of the work in progress.
The illustrative workspace uses representative content to show how evidence, state, and review decisions stay together.
Requirement evidence matrix
Active policy v3One modeled requirement still needs reviewer confirmation
Customer outcomes
What changes for the people doing the work.
Make every requirement traceable before the packet leaves.
Keep the source quote attached.
Preserve document ID, page, extraction method, confidence, verification state, and exact source text for every extracted fact.
Retrieve the active criteria first.
Filter policies by payer, plan, service, version, and effective dates before hybrid retrieval can produce a citable section.
Measure completeness, not approval odds.
Show satisfied requirements, gaps, confidence, and reviewer actions through a transparent Documentation Readiness Score.
Core workflow
A guided path with one accountable reviewer.
The workspace uses bounded steps rather than autonomous decisions, so each material change remains inspectable.
Ingest + extract
Validate documents, extract candidate clinical facts, and attach exact provenance and processing events.
Filter + retrieve
Select active plan- and date-specific policy versions, then retrieve the limited sections eligible for citation.
Match + review
Map evidence to requirements, expose confidence and gaps, and let the reviewer verify or reject facts and matches.
Draft + export
Generate a citation-validated packet, edit and confirm review, preserve the version, and prepare human-readable and structured exports.
Capabilities
One traceable path from uploaded document to packet version.
The workspace connects document intake, active policy review, requirement matching, human verification, packet checks, and review-ready exports in one visible path.
Validated document intake
Accept supported clinical and structured formats, validate the file, and keep processing and review events attached to the case.
Clinical fact provenance
Review or reject extracted evidence beside the exact quote, page, document, extraction method, confidence, and verification state.
Versioned policy library
Upload, version, deactivate, refresh, filter, and search policies while retaining effective dates and section previews.
Requirement evidence matrix
Inspect each criterion with matched clinical evidence, policy citation, confidence, gaps, and an explicit reviewer action.
Transparent readiness score
Calculate documentation completeness from the requirement states without presenting it as approval probability or coverage advice.
Versioned packet and exports
Edit citation-validated drafts, confirm review, preserve prior versions, and prepare human-readable and structured export views.
Example product output
The model may draft. The sources decide what survives.
Only clinical facts with provenance and policy passages returned by the active retriever can support material packet claims. A fluent unsupported statement is treated as an error.
- Policy citations are restricted to the filtered, retrieved active section set.
- Clinical provenance remains attached through evidence matching and packet versioning.
- Unsupported-claim validation can stop a packet from being presented as ready.
- The reviewer verifies facts, confirms matches, edits the draft, and remains accountable for submission.
Prior Authorization Intelligence · NeoTechSource